ACTION FOR FREEDOM VS THE MINISTER OF HEALTH SOUTH AFRICA PART FOUR – MR WILLIS & BUDLEDER ARGUE

Mr Willis: Mylady, there are four primary issues that arise. The first we want to address is the cause of action. The second will be the correct understanding of Section 90, 4, C. We say it is unequivocal. If not unequivocal, then your ladyship looks at the interpretation to interpret. The third issue Mylady is whether the question is premature. And then the fourth issue is the minister’s defense of justifying his decision, which is probably more a part of ultimately the cause of action but I will address it as a fourth point. I want to refer Yourlady to the paragraph. It’s the matter of Kwazulu Natal joint leadership Liason Committee. This is the MEC department of education. The citation is 2013, brackets 4, essay 266, the decision of the constitutional court. Yourlady, I would like to make a note of the following paragraphs, 28, 68, and 79. Your Ladyship will find therein,  support for the following submission…